ARCHAEOLOGY EVIDENCE FILE435
Manuscript

Papyrus P77: Matthew 23:30–34 in a Greek Witness

P77 unites P.Oxy. 2683 and a later-published joining fragment, P.Oxy. 4405, into an early papyrus leaf preserving Matthew 23:30–39.

Artifact date
2nd–3rd Century
Findspot
Egypt; exact ancient findspot is not stated in the consulted manuscript catalogs
Current location
Oxford, United Kingdom, Sackler Library, P. Oxy. 2683 (re-edited as P. Oxy. 4405)
START WITH THE FIND

What archaeologists can actually examine

Gregory-Aland P77 consists of two adjoining Oxyrhynchus fragments from one Greek papyrus codex leaf. P.Oxy. 2683 was published in 1968; P.Oxy. 4405, published in 1997, fits beside it and completes more of the same lines. Together they preserve Matthew 23:30–34 on one side and 23:35–39 on the other. CSNTM assigns the hand to the second or third century. The combined witness carries the conclusion of Jesus' woes through the lament over Jerusalem, much farther than the live title suggests. Its value lies both in its early text and in the physical join that corrected the record of what survived.

01

Two publication numbers form one leaf

P.Oxy. 2683 and P.Oxy. 4405 physically join and together constitute P77.

02

The text reaches verse 39

The witness preserves Matthew 23:30–39, including the lament over Jerusalem, not only verses 30–34.

03

The scribe structured the page

Punctuation, paragraph marks, breathing, diaeresis, and corrections show deliberate reader guidance.

04

One famous reading remains uncertain

Damage at Matthew 23:38 prevents certainty about whether P77 included the word translated 'desolate.'

THE FULL DOSSIER · FOUR-PART REVIEW

Follow the evidence from discovery to debate

Move through the find in a deliberate order: establish its provenance, examine the surviving object, place it in time, and then weigh the scholarly interpretation.

DISCOVERY & PROVENANCE

How the find came to light

Both pieces derive from the Oxyrhynchus papyrus discoveries and are held in Oxford. Their separate publication numbers reflect modern processing, not two ancient books. The larger piece appeared as P.Oxy. XXXIV 2683; decades later editors recognized the smaller P.Oxy. LXIV 4405 as a direct join from the same leaf. That history is archaeologically instructive: excavation produces fragmented archives, and identifications can improve long after removal from the ground. The city-level provenance is secure, but no available record identifies an ancient owner, church, or exact use-context within Oxyrhynchus.

EXAMINE THE OBJECT

What you are looking at

The joined pieces measure roughly eight centimeters across and preserve thirteen extant lines per side; scholars estimate the original codex page had about twenty lines and perhaps measured around ten by fifteen centimeters including margins. The trained hand uses slight word separation, middle-point punctuation, paragraph marks, a rough breathing, and diaeresis. The scribe corrected at least two places, including adding a missed conjunction above the line in Matthew 23:37. Those readerly aids and corrections complicate the stereotype of early Christian books as crude copies. Broken lower and side edges nevertheless leave several readings uncertain.

DATING & CONTEXT

Where it belongs in history

Palaeographers place P77 in the later second or early third century; CSNTM conservatively displays second–third century. There is no explicit date, so claims such as 125–150 should be identified as narrower proposals rather than settled fact. The book belongs among the earlier surviving witnesses to Matthew in Roman Egypt. Similarities of hand and format have prompted a proposal that P77 and P103 came from the same codex, but that relationship is not universally treated as established and requires material as well as palaeographic comparison. Even if correct, it would enlarge the surviving Matthew sample without identifying the codex's users.

SCHOLARLY ASSESSMENT

Consensus, questions, and debate

P77 is often described as close to Codex Sinaiticus or broadly Alexandrian, though the joined leaf also exhibits idiosyncratic spellings and possible influence from Luke 13:34 in the Jerusalem lament. Peter Head noted punctuation, paragraphing, and corrections that reveal a capable but human scribe. At Matthew 23:38 the status of the word 'desolate' is uncertain because the fragment breaks where decisive letters would stand; transcriptions disagree and a videtur qualification is appropriate. The proposed shared codex with P103 remains plausible rather than certain. These details favor reading-by-reading analysis over a slogan about textual purity.

READ THE TEXT

The biblical record beside the artifact

P77 transmits Matthew 23:30–39: Jesus condemns complicity with those who killed the prophets, announces the sending and persecution of messengers, invokes the blood from Abel to Zechariah, and laments Jerusalem as one who wished to gather her children like a hen under wings. It reaches the declaration that the house is left and the promise 'until ye shall say, Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord.' The fragment's spelling and wording can be compared at each verse. It attests early transmission of this connected denunciation and lament, but it does not identify the historical referent of 'house' or independently date Jesus' words.

Matthew 23:30–39

30And say, If we had been in the days of our fathers, we would not have been partakers with them in the blood of the prophets.

31Wherefore ye be witnesses unto yourselves, that ye are the children of them which killed the prophets.

32Fill ye up then the measure of your fathers.

33[Ye] serpents, [ye] generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?

34¶ Wherefore, behold, I send unto you prophets, and wise men, and scribes: and [some] of them ye shall kill and crucify; and [some] of them shall ye scourge in your synagogues, and persecute [them] from city to city:

35That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias son of Barachias, whom ye slew between the temple and the altar.

36Verily I say unto you, All these things shall come upon this generation.

37O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, [thou] that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under [her] wings, and ye would not!

38Behold, your house is left unto you desolate.

39For I say unto you, Ye shall not see me henceforth, till ye shall say, Blessed [is] he that cometh in the name of the Lord.

WHY THIS FIND MATTERS

A responsible historical conclusion

P77 preserves the rhetorical movement from accusation to grief. The lament over Jerusalem is not isolated from the preceding charges; both sides of the same leaf show how an early reader encountered the passage. The joining of a second fragment decades after the first publication also demonstrates how manuscript knowledge changes through patient material work, not merely new interpretation. For textual critics, P77 is an early control on wording, spelling, paragraphing, and correction. For general readers, it makes visible the difference between stable passage identity and real variation in small details.

P77Greek New Testamentpapyrustextual transmissionMatthew