ARCHAEOLOGY EVIDENCE FILE433
Manuscript

Papyrus P71: Matthew 19:10–11 in a Greek Witness

P.Oxy. XXIV 2385 is a late-fourth-century papyrus codex fragment preserving Matthew 19:10–11 and 17–18, including two noteworthy small-scale readings.

Artifact date
4th Century
Findspot
Egypt; exact ancient findspot is not stated in the consulted manuscript catalogs
Current location
Oxford, United Kingdom, Ashmolean Museum, P. Oxy. 2385
START WITH THE FIND

What archaeologists can actually examine

Gregory-Aland P71, P.Oxy. 2385, is a single Greek papyrus fragment from Matthew. One side preserves 19:10–11, the disciples' reaction to Jesus' teaching on marriage; the other preserves 19:17–18, part of Jesus' exchange with the rich young man. CSNTM reconstructs a single-column page with roughly thirty to thirty-two lines, while 4CARE dates the hand more narrowly to about 375–399. The fragment is often summarized by only its first side, but both passages are needed to describe the evidence. It supplies an early witness to Matthew's wording, not a continuous account of the whole chapter.

01

Both faces matter

P71 preserves Matthew 19:10–11 on one side and 19:17–18 on the other, not only the verses in the live title.

02

The hand is late fourth century

Modern palaeographic reassessment narrows the usual fourth-century label to approximately 375–399.

03

Two small omissions are noteworthy

The fragment omits 'Jesus' in verse 17 and uniquely lacks an article in verse 10, without changing the chapter's overall sense.

04

It is an excavated Oxyrhynchus witness

P.Oxy. 2385 has a secure city-level origin and remains in Oxford's papyrology collection.

THE FULL DOSSIER · FOUR-PART REVIEW

Follow the evidence from discovery to debate

Move through the find in a deliberate order: establish its provenance, examine the surviving object, place it in time, and then weigh the scholarly interpretation.

DISCOVERY & PROVENANCE

How the find came to light

The fragment was recovered in the Oxyrhynchus excavations and published in 1957 by Lobel, Roberts, Turner, and Barns in The Oxyrhynchus Papyri XXIV. It is preserved in Oxford's papyrology collection as P.Oxy. 2385 and registered internationally as P71. Its Oxyrhynchus origin is substantially firmer than an undocumented market provenance, though the exact discard deposit, ancient owner, and reading community are not identified by the current catalogues. The editio princeps remains important because it records the initial transcription and handwriting comparisons; later databases refine dating and collate its readings against a wider manuscript record.

EXAMINE THE OBJECT

What you are looking at

P71 is one fragment from a papyrus codex, written in brown ink in a single column. Only about five lines are materially preserved on each face, although comparison with Matthew suggests an original column of thirty or more lines. Letter size and form vary within the biblical majuscule hand. The fragment has no unambiguous surviving sacred-name abbreviation, though one may have stood in a lost portion. Broken edges mean supplied letters dominate any printed reconstruction. The two faces are valuable together: they establish a leaf-book and place separated parts of Matthew 19 within the same physical page sequence.

DATING & CONTEXT

Where it belongs in history

The date comes from palaeographic comparison. CSNTM uses the fourth century; 4CARE reports a late-fourth-century judgment, approximately 375–399, based on recent specialist reassessment. That narrower range remains an expert estimate rather than an absolute date. P71 belongs to the literate environment of late Roman Oxyrhynchus, where biblical codices circulated alongside documentary, classical, and other Christian texts. The fragment's modest scale says nothing secure about the wealth or institutional identity of its users. It also cannot show whether the original codex contained Matthew alone or a larger Gospel collection.

SCHOLARLY ASSESSMENT

Consensus, questions, and debate

The identity, content, Oxyrhynchus provenance, and fourth-century date are well established. Editors have observed affinity with Codex Vaticanus, but one tiny fragment should be compared reading by reading rather than assigned a complete text-type personality. The omission of 'Jesus' is shared evidence of a shorter wording; the missing article appears haplographic and singular in the surveyed tradition. Such differences can arise through copying and do not justify claims of doctrinal alteration. Because so little survives, the fragment cannot reveal the scribe's consistency, the exemplar's overall quality, or the full form of Matthew in this codex.

READ THE TEXT

The biblical record beside the artifact

Matthew 19:10–11 follows Jesus' teaching about marriage and divorce: the disciples say such a condition may make marriage inadvisable, and Jesus answers that not everyone can receive the saying. Matthew 19:17–18 belongs to the rich young man's question about eternal life and Jesus' reply concerning goodness and commandments. P71 directly witnesses parts of both conversations. In verse 17 it is the earliest surviving witness noted by 4CARE for omission of the name 'Jesus' at one point; it also has an isolated omission of the article before 'cause' in verse 10. Those details inform textual history but do not alter the chapter's basic narrative or settle its ethical interpretation.

Matthew 19:10–11

10¶ His disciples say unto him, If the case of the man be so with [his] wife, it is not good to marry.

11But he said unto them, All [men] cannot receive this saying, save [they] to whom it is given.

WHY THIS FIND MATTERS

A responsible historical conclusion

P71 shows textual criticism at an appropriately small scale. A few centimeters of papyrus preserve parts of two conversations and expose minor differences that modern editions must weigh. Its value is not a sensational new Gospel but an independent late-fourth-century checkpoint: readers can see that Matthew 19 circulated in Greek at Oxyrhynchus and can test particular words against other witnesses. The artifact also illustrates how recto and verso transform a scrap into book history. Together they reveal codex use and page sequence, even though almost everything around the surviving lines has disappeared.

P71Greek New Testamentpapyrustextual transmissionMatthew