Papyrus P62: Matthew 11:25–27 in a Greek–Coptic Witness
P62, Oslo P. 1661, is a fourth-century miniature Greek–Akhmimic Coptic codex preserving Matthew 11:25–30 and Daniel 3:50–55, perhaps produced for excerpted, liturgical, devotional, or amuletic use.
- Artifact date
- 4th Century
- Findspot
- Egypt; exact ancient findspot is not stated in the consulted manuscript catalogs
- Current location
- Oslo, University Library, P. Osloensis 1661
What archaeologists can actually examine
P62 is a miniature bilingual Christian codex, not simply a continuous Greek witness to Matthew 11:25–27. Six fragments from about fifteen tiny double leaves preserve Matthew 11:25–30 first in Greek and then in Akhmimic Coptic, followed by Daniel 3:50–55 in Greek. The juxtaposition of Jesus' thanksgiving and invitation to the weary with the Song of the Three Young Men appears deliberate, but the exact use is debated. The codex is direct evidence for translating, excerpting, and physically combining New Testament and Septuagint passages in fourth-century Egyptian Christianity.
Matthew 11:25–30 survives
The artifact includes the invitation to the weary in verses 28–30, not only verses 25–27.
Greek and Akhmimic Coptic
Matthew appears successively in Greek and an Upper Egyptian Coptic dialect, with a bilingual title.
Matthew paired with Daniel
Greek Daniel 3:50–55 follows, showing purposeful excerpt collection across Testaments.
Function remains debated
Its miniature scale supports proposals ranging from devotion and liturgy to amuletic use, but none is proven.
Follow the evidence from discovery to debate
Move through the find in a deliberate order: establish its provenance, examine the surviving object, place it in time, and then weigh the scholarly interpretation.
How the find came to light
The ancient findspot and excavation circumstances are not securely documented in the consulted collection records. The manuscript belongs to the University of Oslo Library's papyrus collection as P. Osloensis 1661 and was published by Leiv Amundsen in 1945 among Christian papyri from Oslo. Modern Oslo collection descriptions call it a miniature New Testament codex, while specialized databases classify it more cautiously as biblical with possible liturgical or applied-magical functions. The absence of an archaeological context prevents identification with a particular church, monastery, owner, or ritual setting.
What you are looking at
The fragments are exceptionally small: the repertory gives approximately 6.5 by 5.6 centimeters, with only one to four lines surviving per fragment and an estimated seven lines per miniature page. Greek Matthew occupies lines 1–62, the Akhmimic Coptic version lines 63–111, and Greek Daniel lines 116–171. A bilingual title to Matthew survives in unusual spelling. The sequence is excerpted rather than a normal full Gospel page. Its codex construction and tiny scale matter for interpretation, since portability may fit private devotion or ritual handling, although physical size alone cannot prove use as an amulet.
Where it belongs in history
P62 is generally assigned to the fourth century through palaeographic comparison. There is no explicit date or scientific measurement. Akhmimic Coptic localizes its translation history more narrowly than the undocumented findspot, connecting the manuscript to Upper Egyptian language culture. The Greek-and-Coptic presentation shows that the same passage could be transmitted across linguistic communities or used by bilingual readers. Its combination of Matthew and Daniel belongs to a culture of selected biblical texts, but whether the booklet served reading, memorization, liturgy, prayer, protection, or consultation remains unresolved.
Consensus, questions, and debate
Specialists agree on the Oslo shelfmark, fourth-century date, miniature codex format, Greek and Akhmimic Coptic languages, and the Matthew-plus-Daniel contents. Debate concerns genre and function. Some cataloging calls it a lectionary or excerpted manuscript; Theodore de Bruyn has listed it as possibly an amulet; recent work on New Testament titles analyzes its bilingual heading without deciding its use. Its readings contribute to Matthew's textual history, but the manuscript's excerpted bilingual design is at least as important as older labels such as 'Alexandrian.' Function must be argued from the whole artifact, not assumed from size.
The biblical record beside the artifact
Matthew 11:25–27 presents Jesus thanking the Father for revelation to the humble and declaring the unique mutual knowledge of Father and Son. P62 continues through verses 28–30, the invitation to the weary to take Jesus' yoke and find rest. Daniel 3:50–55, in the Greek Song of the Three, blesses God amid deliverance from the furnace. Their physical pairing may have joined revelation, rest, praise, and divine rescue for a late-antique reader. P62 witnesses those texts and their translation; it does not prove a specific sacramental, magical, or liturgical interpretation.
Matthew 11:25–30
25¶ At that time Jesus answered and said, I thank thee, O Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because thou hast hid these things from the wise and prudent, and hast revealed them unto babes.
26Even so, Father: for so it seemed good in thy sight.
27All things are delivered unto me of my Father: and no man knoweth the Son, but the Father; neither knoweth any man the Father, save the Son, and [he] to whomsoever the Son will reveal [him.]
28¶ Come unto me, all [ye] that labour and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest.
29Take my yoke upon you, and learn of me; for I am meek and lowly in heart: and ye shall find rest unto your souls.
30For my yoke [is] easy, and my burden is light.
A responsible historical conclusion
P62 offers an unusually intimate view of Scripture in translation. A tiny codex carried the same Matthean passage in Greek and a regional Coptic dialect, then placed a Greek canticle from Daniel beside it. That design shows Christians selecting and recombining biblical material for a concrete purpose beyond producing a complete Bible. It is significant for textual criticism, Coptic translation history, book archaeology, and the study of devotion. Its unresolved function is productive evidence: the object demonstrates what was copied, while reminding readers not to confuse a plausible use with a documented one.
Authoritative sources
Institutional catalogs, excavation reports, and academic publications let you examine the evidence beyond this summary.
KYP M652: Oslo University Library P. 1661
University of Würzburg, Coptic Magical Papyri projectProvides line-by-line contents, language, Akhmimic dialect, alternative functional classifications, and manuscript identifiers.
Titles in the New Testament Papyri
New Testament Studies, Cambridge University PressAnalyzes P62's fourth-century miniature format, Greek-Coptic excerpts, Matthew title, and possible amuletic classification.
Kurzgefasste Liste: Papyri P48–P62
Institut für Neutestamentliche Textforschung / De GruyterConfirms date, fragment and leaf count, dimensions, bilingual Matthew contents, custody, and Amundsen publication.