Papyrus P104 of Matthew
Papyrus P104 is a tiny Oxyrhynchus codex fragment preserving Matthew 21:34-37 and faint verso traces near verses 43 and 45, important both as an early witness and as a warning against overconfident reconstruction.
- Artifact date
- Late first or second century AD
- Findspot
- Oxyrhynchus, Egypt
- Current location
- Sackler Library Papyrology Rooms, University of Oxford
What archaeologists can actually examine
P.Oxy. LXIV 4404, Gregory-Aland P104, is one papyrus fragment from a Greek Gospel codex. Its better-preserved side carries Matthew 21:34-37 from the parable of the tenants; the reverse contains severely abraded traces associated with the later part of the passage, commonly catalogued around Matthew 21:43 and perhaps 45. CSNTM assigns it to the second century and describes a single column of approximately thirty-one lines. The recto is genuine direct textual evidence, while claims about the verso's wording and the presence or absence of verse 44 require much greater caution.
A tiny codex witness
Writing on both sides identifies P104 as part of a bound Gospel book rather than a roll or isolated quotation.
Matthew 21:34-37 is the secure core
The better-preserved face directly witnesses the tenant parable, whereas the reverse is far more uncertain.
Dating rests on comparative handwriting
Later second century is a responsible proposal, not an internally dated year, and nearby hands can extend toward the early third century.
Verse 44 remains unresolved
The abraded verso permits reconstruction proposals but does not decisively establish whether Matthew 21:44 was present or absent.
Follow the evidence from discovery to debate
Move through the find in a deliberate order: establish its provenance, examine the surviving object, place it in time, and then weigh the scholarly interpretation.
How the find came to light
The fragment belongs to the enormous Oxyrhynchus corpus recovered by Grenfell, Hunt, and later Egypt Exploration Society work from the city's rubbish mounds. It was not fully published until volume LXIV of The Oxyrhynchus Papyri in 1997, when J. David Thomas edited it as number 4404. It remains in Oxford's papyrology collections and has been imaged through the Oxford Imaging Papyri Project. The long interval between excavation, identification, publication, and digitization is typical of a collection containing hundreds of thousands of fragments awaiting conservation and specialist reading.
What you are looking at
P104 is a very small, broken piece of papyrus from a codex leaf, roughly seven by five centimeters in published descriptions. Greek letters survive in a single column; projected line count is about thirty-one. One side is substantially clearer, while the reverse is rubbed so heavily that many proposed letters require dots of uncertainty in an edition. Writing on both sides establishes codex form. Its physical smallness is decisive for interpretation: line-length reconstruction can test possible sequences, but tiny margins and lost fibers leave too little evidence for confident claims about every intervening verse.
Where it belongs in history
The first editor compared the handwriting with other early literary hands and proposed the later second century. CSNTM uses the broader label '2nd Century,' while Roger Bagnall places P104 within a cluster whose comparative scripts often span the late second and early third centuries. Palaeography normally supplies ranges, not exact years, especially for literary hands without securely dated close parallels. The fragment nevertheless belongs among the earliest surviving copies of Matthew. That importance should sharpen, not relax, caution about using an early date to make population, canon, or textual-stability claims from one leaf.
Consensus, questions, and debate
The key debates concern date and reconstruction. Thomas favored a later second-century date from palaeographic comparison, while broader studies of early Christian books emphasize that the same comparison group can drift into the early third century. On the reverse, some reconstructions move from verse 43 to 45 and infer omission of verse 44; others stress that abrasion makes the reading exceptionally tentative. Text critics must distinguish what ink is visible, what letters are proposed, and what sequence is inferred from spacing. The fragment's fame as an early Matthew witness has sometimes obscured those separate confidence levels.
The biblical record beside the artifact
The readable side directly preserves the sequence in Matthew 21:34-37 where the landowner sends servants and then his son to the tenants. The reverse has been aligned with Matthew 21:43 and possibly 45, making the treatment of verse 44 a frequently discussed question. Because nearly every proposed reverse letter is uncertain, P104 cannot simply be advertised as decisive proof that verse 44 was absent. Its responsible biblical contribution is narrower and stronger: it shows that this parable circulated in a Greek Matthew codex at an early date and supplies specific letters for textual comparison.
Matthew 21:34
34And when the time of the fruit drew near, he sent his servants to the husbandmen, that they might receive the fruits of it.
A responsible historical conclusion
P104 demonstrates both the promise and discipline of papyrology. A scrap smaller than a modern note card can anchor several verses of Matthew in an early codex and illuminate the spread of Christian books in Roman Egypt. Yet the same scrap shows why responsible scholarship uses underdots, ranges, and conditional language: damaged fibers do not yield certainty because a desired textual conclusion would be interesting. For readers, its value lies in seeing how manuscript history is constructed from material measurements, handwriting comparisons, line reconstruction, and open disagreement rather than from sensational claims about the 'oldest' text.
Authoritative sources
Institutional catalogs, excavation reports, and academic publications let you examine the evidence beyond this summary.
Manuscript P104
Center for the Study of New Testament ManuscriptsCatalogues date, Oxford location, P.Oxy. 4404 identifier, papyrus codex format, layout, and represented passages.
Images: The Oxyrhynchus Papyri
University of Oxford and Egypt Exploration SocietyExplains the institutional image corpus, Oxford holdings, Imaging Papyri Project, publication search, and reproduction controls.
Early Christian Books in Egypt, chapter 1: Dating the Earliest Christian Books
Princeton University PressDiscusses Thomas's publication and later-second-century proposal for P.Oxy. 4404 while exposing the wider palaeographic range and methodological debate.