ARCHAEOLOGY EVIDENCE FILE282
Manuscript

Papyrus P1 of Matthew

Papyrus P1, excavated at Oxyrhynchus in 1897, preserves two numbered pages from a third-century codex of Matthew 1, material evidence that the Gospel circulated in codex form in Roman Egypt.

Artifact date
Third century AD
Discovered
1897
Findspot
Oxyrhynchus, Egypt
Current location
Penn Museum, E 2746, Philadelphia
START WITH THE FIND

What archaeologists can actually examine

Penn Museum E 2746, published as P.Oxy. 2 and catalogued Gregory-Aland P1, consists of two papyrus fragments from a codex page preserving Matthew 1:1-9, 12, and 14-20. Greek page numbers alpha and beta appear at the top, showing that the genealogy and birth narrative stood at the opening of this particular Gospel codex. The hand is assigned to the third century. P1 is early and valuable, but it represents only a few verses copied generations after Matthew's composition and cannot demonstrate the wording of the entire Gospel.

01

Excavated in the first Oxyrhynchus season

Grenfell and Hunt recovered the fragment from the city's rubbish mounds in January 1897, giving it a documented archaeological context.

02

The page was a codex leaf

Writing on both sides and the alpha-beta page numerals identify the fragments as the opening leaf of a bound book.

03

Matthew 1 survives discontinuously

The fragment preserves verses 1-9, 12, and 14-20; physical loss, not intentional omission, explains the gaps.

04

The date is a range

Third-century attribution rests on comparative handwriting and should not be narrowed to a precise year.

THE FULL DOSSIER · FOUR-PART REVIEW

Follow the evidence from discovery to debate

Move through the find in a deliberate order: establish its provenance, examine the surviving object, place it in time, and then weigh the scholarly interpretation.

DISCOVERY & PROVENANCE

How the find came to light

Bernard Grenfell and Arthur Hunt opened their first Oxyrhynchus campaign in January 1897 with workers excavating rubbish mounds outside the ancient city. During the first week they recovered the Matthew fragment among the mass of documentary and literary papyri preserved by Egypt's climate. It was published in the first Oxyrhynchus volume and distributed through the Egypt Exploration Fund to the University Museum in Philadelphia in 1901. Unlike many antiquities purchased without context, P1 has a documented excavation provenance, publication history, institutional number, and connection to the foundational Oxyrhynchus project.

EXAMINE THE OBJECT

What you are looking at

The fragments are papyrus written in Greek ink on both sides, demonstrating that they came from a leaf of a codex rather than a one-sided sheet or continuous roll. Penn records dimensions of about 15 by 16.9 centimeters; CSNTM describes a single column with approximately twenty-five to twenty-seven lines. The surviving text is discontinuous because the leaf is broken, not because the scribe intentionally omitted whole genealogical sections. Page numerals alpha and beta are a particularly useful physical clue, placing the leaf at the very beginning of the manuscript's page sequence.

DATING & CONTEXT

Where it belongs in history

Palaeographic comparison assigns P1 to the third century, and Penn's catalogue gives AD 200-300. That range is based on handwriting rather than a dated colophon or archaeological layer precise to a decade. Oxyrhynchus was a major Greco-Roman Egyptian city whose rubbish mounds preserved administrative papers and literary books alike; the find therefore situates a Matthew codex within the documentary landscape of Roman Egypt. The codex format is significant for Christian book culture, but one fragment cannot reveal the size, ownership, liturgical use, or complete contents of the original volume.

SCHOLARLY ASSESSMENT

Consensus, questions, and debate

The identification as Matthew and the third-century placement are standard, supported by the readable text, codex form, and palaeography. Detailed textual classification is less decisive than popular summaries suggest because the surviving sample is short and genealogies naturally constrain wording. Older scholarship sometimes called fragments like P1 among the 'oldest' Gospel copies without emphasizing date ranges and the rapid growth of the known papyrus corpus. Modern study treats it as one witness among several. The excavation account's historical conjecture that persecution sent Christian books to dumps should not be presented as the demonstrated cause of this leaf's disposal.

READ THE TEXT

The biblical record beside the artifact

P1 directly transmits portions of Matthew 1:1-9, 1:12, and 1:14-20, spanning Jesus' genealogy and the beginning of the account concerning Mary and Joseph. The artifact demonstrates that these passages were being copied together near the opening of a Greek Matthew codex in the third century. Comparison with other manuscripts can identify spelling, name forms, word order, and corrections. Because intervening portions are physically lost, absence on the fragment is not evidence that the ancient codex omitted those verses. P1 supplies textual testimony, not archaeological proof of the genealogy's historical individuals.

Matthew 1:1–9

1The book of the generation of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham.

2Abraham begat Isaac; and Isaac begat Jacob; and Jacob begat Judas and his brethren;

3And Judas begat Phares and Zara of Thamar; and Phares begat Esrom; and Esrom begat Aram;

4And Aram begat Aminadab; and Aminadab begat Naasson; and Naasson begat Salmon;

5And Salmon begat Booz of Rachab; and Booz begat Obed of Ruth; and Obed begat Jesse;

6And Jesse begat David the king; and David the king begat Solomon of her [that had been the wife] of Urias;

7And Solomon begat Roboam; and Roboam begat Abia; and Abia begat Asa;

8And Asa begat Josaphat; and Josaphat begat Joram; and Joram begat Ozias;

9And Ozias begat Joatham; and Joatham begat Achaz; and Achaz begat Ezekias;

WHY THIS FIND MATTERS

A responsible historical conclusion

P1 joins words, object, and findspot in an unusually clear chain. Readers can connect Matthew's opening not to an abstract manuscript list but to a numbered papyrus codex recovered from a documented Oxyrhynchus excavation and now preserved under a stable museum identifier. The leaf contributes to the history of how early Christians adopted and produced codices, how Greek Scripture traveled in Egypt, and how damaged books entered rubbish deposits. Its modest extent is part of the lesson: the textual record survives by fragments, and responsible reconstruction depends on comparing many incomplete witnesses.

manuscriptPapyrus 1P.Oxy. 2E 2746Matthew