
Uncial 097: Acts beneath a Georgian Palimpsest
Uncial 097: Acts beneath a Georgian Palimpsest is a separately registered physical witness to the copying and reception of Acts 13:39–46, identified by its own GA number, shelfmark, date, layout, and custodial history.
- Artifact date
- Seventh-century Greek undertext; tenth-century Georgian overtext
- Findspot
- Probably the eastern Mediterranean; recovered as an erased layer in a later Georgian manuscript
- Current location
- Russian National Library, Saint Petersburg, Gr. 18
What archaeologists can actually examine
One palimpsest leaf preserves Acts 13:39–46 in Greek beneath a tenth-century Georgian overtext. The passage covers Paul’s synagogue appeal, rejection by part of the audience, and the turn toward the Gentiles.
A controlled manuscript identity
Gregory–Aland 097 and Russian National Library, Saint Petersburg, Gr. 18 identify this physical witness independently of generic manuscript names.
The page is evidence
The original page measured about 26 by 21 centimeters and used two columns of eighteen large majuscule lines. Erasure, reuse, and the overlying Georgian script obscure portions of the Greek, making the leaf a layered artifact of two manuscript cultures.
Directly preserved Scripture
The surviving leaves physically preserve Acts 13:39–46, rather than merely illustrating the same biblical theme.
Limits remain visible
The lower writing is difficult to read and preserves only eight verses. Reconstruction must distinguish Greek undertext, Georgian overtext, erasure marks, and damage. The palimpsest’s later Georgian context does not locate the original Greek copying workshop.
Follow the evidence from discovery to debate
Move through the find in a deliberate order: establish its provenance, examine the surviving object, place it in time, and then weigh the scholarly interpretation.
How the find came to light
Constantin von Tischendorf examined and published the undertext, and Kurt Treu later reassessed Greek New Testament manuscripts in the former Soviet collections. The early route before the Russian National Library remains uncertain. The modern GA identifier and repository shelfmark are treated as complementary controls on identity: the first connects the object to international textual scholarship, while the second identifies the physical leaf or codex in its present collection. This is especially important where old catalogs divided leaves that belong together, joined fragments that later proved distinct, or used a nickname based on a collector rather than a place of production. The record therefore distinguishes recovery place, copying place, later custody, publication, and current location. Where the early route is undocumented, it remains unknown rather than being reconstructed from a later library label. Facsimiles and digital workspaces extend access, but the original parchment remains the archaeological object.
What you are looking at
One palimpsest leaf preserves Acts 13:39–46 in Greek beneath a tenth-century Georgian overtext. The passage covers Paul’s synagogue appeal, rejection by part of the audience, and the turn toward the Gentiles. The original page measured about 26 by 21 centimeters and used two columns of eighteen large majuscule lines. Erasure, reuse, and the overlying Georgian script obscure portions of the Greek, making the leaf a layered artifact of two manuscript cultures. The dossier reads the writing surface as evidence alongside the copied words. Column count, line count, page size, ink, letter formation, nomina sacra, punctuation, corrections, commentary, pagination, reuse, and broken margins each answer different questions about production and use. A single photographed side cannot stand for every page of a lost codex, so the image caption identifies the exact role of the surviving leaf. The selected public-domain image depicts this manuscript itself rather than a generic scribe, modern painting, or unrelated Bible. Where fragments share a parent codex, they are consolidated into one interpretive record instead of being counted as independent artifacts.
Where it belongs in history
The display date “Seventh-century Greek undertext; tenth-century Georgian overtext” follows current catalog and palaeographic judgment. Letter shapes, ruling, page design, material, related dated hands, and publication history can narrow a range, but most of these manuscripts do not carry a copied colophon that supplies a modern calendar year. The artifact directly preserves Acts 13:39–46; that is a material connection to Scripture in the manuscript’s own historical period, not a claim that the leaf was present when the narrated events occurred. Later date does not automatically mean worthless text, and early date does not automatically make every reading original. Textual criticism weighs agreements, differences, corrections, scribal habits, translation, and genealogy passage by passage.
Consensus, questions, and debate
The undertext is a mixed witness with a substantial Byzantine element. More important than a simple text-type label, the object demonstrates how a Greek Acts codex was dismantled and its parchment reused within Georgian Christian book culture. The lower writing is difficult to read and preserves only eight verses. Reconstruction must distinguish Greek undertext, Georgian overtext, erasure marks, and damage. The palimpsest’s later Georgian context does not locate the original Greek copying workshop. The secure minimum claim is concrete: this registered manuscript exists, contains the stated biblical words, belongs within the documented date range, and preserves the described physical layout. Text-type descriptions summarize clusters of readings; they are not labels of inspiration, orthodoxy, geography, or automatic superiority. Relationships between separated fragments require common material, hand, dimensions, lineation, and textual sequence rather than a shared modern title alone. The INTF workspace controls registry identity, CSNTM supplies an independent manuscript catalog where available, and the scholarly bibliography points readers to facsimiles and collations. None of these objects “proves the Bible” in isolation. Together they allow the history of copying, correction, interpretation, translation, loss, reuse, and recovery to be tested.
The biblical record beside the artifact
The surviving parchment directly preserves Acts 13:39–46. It is therefore material evidence for the copying, organization, reading, translation, commentary, or reuse of these biblical texts in the manuscript’s own period.
Acts 13:39–46
39And by him all that believe are justified from all things, from which ye could not be justified by the law of Moses.
40Beware therefore, lest that come upon you, which is spoken of in the prophets;
41Behold, ye despisers, and wonder, and perish: for I work a work in your days, a work which ye shall in no wise believe, though a man declare it unto you.
42And when the Jews were gone out of the synagogue, the Gentiles besought that these words might be preached to them the next sabbath.
43Now when the congregation was broken up, many of the Jews and religious proselytes followed Paul and Barnabas: who, speaking to them, persuaded them to continue in the grace of God.
44¶ And the next sabbath day came almost the whole city together to hear the word of God.
45But when the Jews saw the multitudes, they were filled with envy, and spake against those things which were spoken by Paul, contradicting and blaspheming.
46Then Paul and Barnabas waxed bold, and said, It was necessary that the word of God should first have been spoken to you: but seeing ye put it from you, and judge yourselves unworthy of everlasting life, lo, we turn to the Gentiles.
A responsible historical conclusion
Uncial 097: Acts beneath a Georgian Palimpsest makes textual transmission visible at human scale. A reader can see a scribe ruling a page, arranging columns, contracting sacred names, signaling quotations, surrounding Scripture with commentary, copying across what later became a chapter boundary, or reusing older parchment. The object’s limitations are part of its value: a tiny leaf teaches why scholars distinguish direct observation from reconstruction, why catalog identities sometimes change, and why multiple witnesses must be compared. Connected Bible pages make the surviving passages discoverable in both directions, while the institutional resources let readers revisit the catalog evidence. The result is historically grounded confidence without treating every variant as a crisis or every ancient fragment as a complete answer.
Authoritative sources
Institutional catalogs, excavation reports, and academic publications let you examine the evidence beyond this summary.
NT.VMR manuscript workspace: GA 097
University of Münster INTFOfficial registry workspace identifying GA 097, its manuscript class, contents, current repository, and digital witnesses.
CSNTM catalog: GA 097
Center for the Study of New Testament ManuscriptsInstitutional manuscript catalog used to corroborate the date, material, leaf count, layout, contents, location, and shelfmark of GA 097.
A Bibliography of Greek New Testament Manuscripts
Cambridge University PressScholarly bibliographic framework for published facsimiles, collations, catalog identities, and textual studies of Greek New Testament manuscripts.
Uncial 097: Acts beneath a Georgian Palimpsest image and rights record
Wikimedia CommonsSource page for the authentic manuscript image used here; Historical manuscript facsimile via Wikimedia Commons, Public domain.
The palimpsest leaf of Uncial 097 preserving Acts 13 · Historical manuscript facsimile via Wikimedia Commons · Public domain
View the image source and license