Papyrus P137: Mark 1:7–9; Mark 1:16–18 in a Greek Witness
Papyrus P137, P.Oxy. LXXXIII 5345, is a late-second- or early-third-century codex fragment of Mark 1 whose publication corrected years of unsupported 'first-century Mark' claims.
- Artifact date
- Late 2nd–early 3rd Century
- Findspot
- Oxyrhynchus, Egypt
- Current location
- Oxford, United Kingdom, Art, Archaeology and Ancient World Library, P. Oxy. 5345
What archaeologists can actually examine
P137 is a small two-sided papyrus codex fragment preserving Mark 1:7–9 on one face and 1:16–18 on the other. The text includes John the Baptist's announcement and Jesus' baptism, followed later by the call of Simon and Andrew. Published as P.Oxy. 5345 in 2018 and registered as P137, it is currently the earliest cataloged manuscript fragment of Mark. That distinction is important but narrow. The papyrus is not a first-century autograph, and only a few partial lines survive. Its strongest contribution is an early physical witness to Mark's opening chapter, coupled with an unusually well-documented correction of premature dating and ownership claims.
Earliest cataloged Mark fragment
P137 is presently the earliest registered physical witness to Mark, dated to the late second or early third century.
Rumor corrected by publication
The final edition and dated-hand comparison replaced unsupported claims that the fragment was first century.
EES ownership was continuous
The Egypt Exploration Society states that P.Oxy. 5345 was excavated for its collection and was never offered for sale by the Society.
Only a tiny sample survives
About four centimeters of papyrus preserves partial lines from Mark 1:7–9 and 1:16–18, limiting broader textual conclusions.
Follow the evidence from discovery to debate
Move through the find in a deliberate order: establish its provenance, examine the surviving object, place it in time, and then weigh the scholarly interpretation.
How the find came to light
Grenfell and Hunt excavated the fragment at Oxyrhynchus, probably in 1903 based on its inventory context, although flattening and resorting later obscured the exact season number. A preliminary record card once suggested a first- or second-century hand without identifying the text. After recognition as Mark in 2011, private conversations generated public claims about a first-century Gospel fragment and possible sale. The Egypt Exploration Society reviewed its holdings, established that the piece was and remained EES property, and required publication. Dirk Obbink and Daniela Colomo published it in 2018. The EES statement is essential evidence because it separates verified excavation, ownership, and final dating from rumor.
What you are looking at
The surviving piece measures about 4.4 by 4 centimeters, with reconstructed page dimensions near 9.4 by 12 centimeters and roughly twenty-five lines per page. Both sides carry Greek text, identifying it as part of a codex leaf. Abrasion is severe, especially on one face, and the clearest identification depends on a small number of letter sequences aligned with Mark 1. The hand is a competent but not luxurious literary script. Its small page reconstruction may point to a compact book, but a lone fragment cannot reveal binding, quire arrangement, decoration, or whether the codex contained Mark alone or multiple Gospels.
Where it belongs in history
The editors assign P137 to the late second or early third century after comparison with objectively dated documentary and literary hands. This replaced the preliminary first-/second-century note that had fueled popular claims. Palaeography yields a range, not an exact year, and responsible presentation retains both ends. As an Oxyrhynchus codex fragment, P137 shows Mark circulating in Greek in Roman Egypt relatively early in the Gospel's transmission. It does not establish the date of Mark's composition, identify its scribe or reader, or prove the codex was copied at Oxyrhynchus rather than merely discarded there.
Consensus, questions, and debate
The final edition and EES review support the late-second-/early-third-century date, codex format, Mark identification, and continuous EES ownership. The main public controversy concerned claims made before publication: that the fragment was first century and available for purchase. EES records contradict both claims. Textually, specialists discuss the wording of Mark 1:8 and other small variants, but the fragment is too limited for a robust text-type classification. 'Earliest Mark' means earliest currently cataloged material witness, not first copy, best text, or direct link to the evangelist. The story is a case study in why unpublished fragments should not carry sensational historical conclusions.
The biblical record beside the artifact
Mark 1:7–9 presents John's proclamation of the stronger coming one, contrasts his water baptism with the coming baptism in the Holy Spirit, and introduces Jesus' baptism. Mark 1:16–18 narrates Jesus calling Simon and Andrew from their nets. P137 preserves Greek traces from both units on opposite sides of a codex leaf. In Mark 1:8 its surviving text contributes to discussion of the preposition used with water and Spirit, but the damaged fragment must be collated with the broader tradition. It attests early transmission of these verses; it cannot independently prove the baptism, call of the disciples, or Markan authorship.
Mark 1:7–9
7And preached, saying, There cometh one mightier than I after me, the latchet of whose shoes I am not worthy to stoop down and unloose.
8I indeed have baptized you with water: but he shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost.
9And it came to pass in those days, that Jesus came from Nazareth of Galilee, and was baptized of John in Jordan.
A responsible historical conclusion
P137 matters twice: as early evidence for Mark and as a lesson in scholarly verification. The artifact places portions of Mark's opening proclamation, baptism scene, and discipleship call in a small Egyptian codex around the turn of the third century. Its modern history shows what can go wrong when private previews and provisional notes outrun publication. Once ownership, inventory, handwriting comparisons, and images were made available, the supposed first-century object became a still-important but more accurately dated witness. That correction is not a disappointment; it is archaeology working properly, replacing rumor with an inspectable object, edition, provenance statement, and bounded conclusion.
Authoritative sources
Institutional catalogs, excavation reports, and academic publications let you examine the evidence beyond this summary.
P.Oxy. LXXXIII 5345
Egypt Exploration SocietyDocuments ownership, inventory history, identification, corrected dating, excavation context, and the response to first-century and sale claims.
P.Oxy. LXXXIII 5345: Mark 1:7–9, 16–18
University of Oxford Sustainable Digital ScholarshipProvides the exact object identity, passage range, publication record, and plate context.
INTF manuscript workspace P137
Institut für Neutestamentliche Textforschung, University of MünsterControls the Gregory-Aland identity and current registry metadata.
Kurzgefasste Liste, June 2018 update
Institut für Neutestamentliche Textforschung, University of MünsterRecords dimensions, reconstructed page, line count, date, shelfmark, contents, and publication bibliography for P137.