Fragmentary papyrus leaves of P128 with Greek text from the Gospel of John
ARCHAEOLOGY EVIDENCE FILE464
Manuscript

Papyrus P128: John 9:3–4; John 12:12–13; John 12:16–18 in a Greek Witness

Papyrus P128 is a sixth- or seventh-century Greek papyrus lectionary fragment from the Monastery of Epiphanius at Thebes, preserving excerpts from John 9 and 12 and now cataloged separately from P44.

Artifact date
6th–7th Century
Findspot
Egypt; exact ancient findspot is not securely established in the consulted sources
Current location
New York, Metropolitan Museum of Art, Department of Egyptian Art, Inv. 14.1.527
START WITH THE FIND

What archaeologists can actually examine

P128 is the Gregory-Aland designation for the Johannine portions of Metropolitan Museum of Art 14.1.527 formerly grouped with P44. The surviving papyrus preserves John 9:3–4 and portions of John 12:12–13 and 12:16–18. Two leaves were written in one column of roughly fifty lines, a dense arrangement suited to a liturgical rather than continuous Gospel book. The passages are not adjacent in John, and the wider publication identifies the pieces as a lectionary from the Monastery of Epiphanius. The artifact therefore witnesses both the Greek wording and the later Christian practice of selecting Gospel readings for worship. Its value is material and textual: it is an actual late-antique copy, not independent evidence that the narrated healing or entry occurred.

01

A reclassified Johannine witness

The John 9 and 12 fragments formerly grouped with P44 are now separately registered as Gregory-Aland P128.

02

A Theban lectionary

The discontinuous passages and museum publication identify the object as a liturgical Gospel witness from the Monastery of Epiphanius.

03

Dense single-column pages

Two papyrus leaves carried roughly fifty Greek lines per column, although damage leaves only portions readable.

04

Secure image identity

The included candidate depicts Met 14.1.527 itself and carries an explicit public-domain statement on its Commons file page.

THE FULL DOSSIER · FOUR-PART REVIEW

Follow the evidence from discovery to debate

Move through the find in a deliberate order: establish its provenance, examine the surviving object, place it in time, and then weigh the scholarly interpretation.

DISCOVERY & PROVENANCE

How the find came to light

The fragments entered the Metropolitan Museum through its work at the Monastery of Epiphanius in western Thebes and were published by Walter Ewing Crum and H. G. Evelyn-White in the museum's 1926 excavation report. Older literature treated the Johannine pieces as part of P44 because the same museum number encompasses several biblical fragments. Subsequent manuscript cataloging separated these leaves as P128, while P44 retained different passages. That history explains why older references and image captions may use P44b or the monastery publication number rather than P128. The excavated monastic context is unusually valuable, but the surviving documentation does not establish who copied the leaves, how long they were used, or the exact room in which every fragment originally functioned.

EXAMINE THE OBJECT

What you are looking at

The object consists of damaged papyrus leaves with Greek ink, single-column layout, and about fifty lines per column. The Met publication describes the group as lectionary fragments, and the selected passages are compatible with readings assembled for liturgical use rather than surviving consecutive folios of a complete John codex. Tears and lacunae interrupt words and lines, so printed transcriptions distinguish visible letters from editorial restoration. The writing belongs to a developed Christian book hand, while the manuscript's physical grouping and accession number must not be confused with the later Gregory-Aland division between P44 and P128. The exact-object Met and Commons image provides an authentic view of the papyrus rather than a representative manuscript.

DATING & CONTEXT

Where it belongs in history

The sixth- to seventh-century date combines palaeographic comparison with the archaeological and historical context of the Theban monastery, whose community flourished in the early Byzantine and early Islamic periods. It is a range, not a dated colophon. The lectionary format is significant because it shows Gospel text being copied for patterned public reading several centuries after John's composition. P128 is consequently later than many continuous-text papyri but valuable for the history of worship, pronunciation, and textual transmission. Its find context supports use at Epiphanius's monastery; it does not prove that the papyrus was manufactured there or that every fragment under accession 14.1.527 belonged to one original volume.

SCHOLARLY ASSESSMENT

Consensus, questions, and debate

Catalogs agree on the Met shelfmark, Greek language, papyrus material, Johannine contents, and approximate sixth- to seventh-century date. The principal cataloging issue is historical identity: the leaves once circulated in scholarship as part of P44 and now carry P128. Readers should therefore search both designations when following older bibliography. The Met's description of the broader object as a lectionary also cautions against calling it simply two leaves of a continuous Gospel codex. Classification does not diminish the witness; it sharpens what kind of Christian book survives. Because the text is fragmentary and comparatively late, individual readings must be weighed with the full manuscript tradition rather than treated as automatically original.

READ THE TEXT

The biblical record beside the artifact

John 9:3–4 places Jesus' response about the man's blindness and the works of God within the healing narrative. John 12:12–13 and 12:16–18 belong to the entry into Jerusalem, including the crowd's acclamation and the disciples' later understanding. P128 physically transmits portions of these texts in Greek and shows that both scenes were selected for Christian reading in late-antique Egypt. The discontinuity is interpretively important: the papyrus does not preserve the whole Gospel sequence, but a liturgical arrangement. It can be collated with other witnesses for wording and scribal practice; it cannot independently authenticate the miracle, identify the Gospel's author, or determine the original form of every damaged phrase.

John 9:3–4

3Jesus answered, Neither hath this man sinned, nor his parents: but that the works of God should be made manifest in him.

4I must work the works of him that sent me, while it is day: the night cometh, when no man can work.

WHY THIS FIND MATTERS

A responsible historical conclusion

P128 joins text, worship, and archaeology in one controlled object. It preserves recognizable lines from two very different Johannine scenes while its nonconsecutive arrangement reveals how a Theban monastic community encountered those lines as readings. The manuscript also offers a useful lesson in responsible catalog history: one museum accession can contain pieces later distinguished as separate textual witnesses, and new numbering can correct rather than erase older scholarship. For readers, the fragment demonstrates that New Testament transmission was not only the copying of complete books; it also included lectionaries shaped by communal practice. Its secure institutional custody and excavated context make it more informative than an unprovenanced market fragment.

P128Greek New Testamentpapyrustextual transmissionJohn