
Papyrus P122: John 21:11–14 and 22–24 in a Greek Witness
P.Oxy. LXXI 4806, Gregory-Aland P122, is a fourth- or fifth-century papyrus codex fragment preserving the miraculous catch and final testimony passages near the end of John.
- Artifact date
- 4th–5th Century
- Findspot
- Oxyrhynchus, Egypt
- Current location
- Oxford, United Kingdom, Art, Archaeology and Ancient World Library, P. Oxy. 4806
What archaeologists can actually examine
P122 consists of two pieces from a papyrus codex leaf published as P.Oxy. LXXI 4806. Its Greek text preserves John 21:11–14, including the net of 153 fish and Jesus’ meal with the disciples, and 21:22–24, including Jesus’ response about the beloved disciple and the statement that this disciple testifies and wrote these things. The leaf therefore bears on both a memorable narrative detail and the Gospel’s closing self-presentation. It materially attests late-antique copying of John 21 but cannot by itself identify the beloved disciple, demonstrate eyewitness authorship, or settle the compositional history of the epilogue.
The ending of John is physically attested
P122 preserves the catch narrative in 21:11–14 and the closing testimony in 21:22–24.
Two pieces came from one leaf
Fiber direction and text sequence identify recto and verso portions of a single papyrus codex page.
The page was probably tall
A reconstruction of about forty-four lines and a 10-by-24-centimeter writing area is plausible but remains inferential.
A copied claim is not external confirmation
The manuscript attests transmission of John’s witness statement; it does not independently identify or authenticate that witness.
Follow the evidence from discovery to debate
Move through the find in a deliberate order: establish its provenance, examine the surviving object, place it in time, and then weigh the scholarly interpretation.
How the find came to light
Like the adjacent P.Oxy. 4803–4805 manuscripts, P122 derives from the Grenfell and Hunt excavations at Oxyrhynchus undertaken for the Egypt Exploration Fund in 1896–1907. J. David Thomas published it in 2007 in The Oxyrhynchus Papyri LXXI, and the INTF registered it as P122. It is preserved in the Oxford collection under P.Oxy. 4806. The city-level origin and modern chain from excavation collection to publication are stronger than those of an unprovenanced market fragment, but accessible records do not associate it with a precise building, archaeological layer, depositional date, named owner, or identifiable Christian institution.
What you are looking at
Two papyrus pieces from one codex leaf preserve a single-column text. Reconstruction proposes approximately forty-four lines per page, twenty-five to twenty-seven letters per line, and a writing area around 10 by 24 centimeters. That tall, densely written page is inferred from textual spacing and surviving fiber orientation; most of the leaf is absent. Both faces contain John 21, with lost lines separating the surviving ranges. The hand, line breaks, sacred-name forms, and damaged margins allow codicological analysis, but a fragmentary leaf cannot disclose the original quire count, binding, complete contents, or whether the final Gospel title stood immediately after the extant ending.
Where it belongs in history
The manuscript is assigned to the fourth or fifth century by palaeography. The range appropriately reflects uncertainty because no colophon dates the copy. John was already circulating widely in Greek codices, and Oxyrhynchus has produced multiple Johannine fragments from different centuries and hands. That concentration documents repeated local possession or discard of John manuscripts, not necessarily a single scriptorium or textual lineage. P122’s papyrus material remained practical in late antiquity even as parchment books became prominent. Neither material nor handwriting proves the exemplar’s age, geographic origin, or the number of copying generations separating it from the Gospel’s composition.
Consensus, questions, and debate
Stable conclusions include the shelfmark, Oxyrhynchus origin, Johannine identification, two-piece leaf, and fourth/fifth-century range. Debates concern the reconstruction of the tall page, individual readings, and the interpretive use of John 21’s closing testimony. The artifact is sometimes invoked in authorship discussions because it preserves verses 22–24, but a manuscript copying a claim is not independent corroboration of that claim. Likewise, the relatively late papyrus cannot decide literary questions about an epilogue. Its text should be assessed at individual variation units; a short sample does not justify treating it as a pure representative of a named regional text type.
The biblical record beside the artifact
The exact Scripture connections are John 21:11–14 and 21:22–24. The first describes Simon Peter hauling the unbroken net, the count of 153 fish, and Jesus sharing bread and fish; the second records Jesus’ words about the beloved disciple and the closing testimony to his witness and writing. The absent intervening verses should not be implied as surviving. P122 can be compared with other witnesses where wording varies, and it anchors these units in a physical codex. It does not explain the symbolic meaning, if any, of 153, prove the identity of the witness, or decide whether chapter 21 was composed with the preceding Gospel.
John 21:11–14
11Simon Peter went up, and drew the net to land full of great fishes, an hundred and fifty and three: and for all there were so many, yet was not the net broken.
12Jesus saith unto them, Come [and] dine. And none of the disciples durst ask him, Who art thou? knowing that it was the Lord.
13Jesus then cometh, and taketh bread, and giveth them, and fish likewise.
14This is now the third time that Jesus shewed himself to his disciples, after that he was risen from the dead.
A responsible historical conclusion
P122 preserves both the concrete detail of a counted catch and the Gospel’s statement about testimony, making it unusually useful for showing the difference between textual and historical evidence. The papyrus establishes that late-antique readers encountered these words in sequence within John; it does not independently validate their narrator. Codicologically, the reconstructed tall page offers a glimpse of economical papyrus book design. Textually, it adds an independently copied witness to the closing chapter, where even modest variants can affect interpretation. The object therefore rewards close reading while resisting the exaggerated claim that an ancient manuscript automatically verifies everything its text reports.
Authoritative sources
Institutional catalogs, excavation reports, and academic publications let you examine the evidence beyond this summary.
Manuscript P122
Center for the Study of New Testament ManuscriptsDocuments date range, Oxford shelfmark, papyrus material, fragmentary codex form, and image provenance.
INTF Manuscript Workspace P122
Institute for New Testament Textual Research, University of MünsterControls the witness designation and supports verse-level manuscript comparison.
P.Oxy. LXXI 4806
The Oxyrhynchus Papyri, University of OxfordInstitutional context for the artifact published in The Oxyrhynchus Papyri volume LXXI.
P.Oxy. LXXI 4806 / Gregory-Aland P122
4CARE, MF Norwegian School of TheologyProvides record-specific contents, date range, archaeological provenance, accession number, physical description, and editio princeps bibliography.
P. Oxy. 4806 (P122), a fragment of John 21. · Unknown ancient scribe / Oxford Imaging Papyri Project, via Wikimedia Commons · Public domain
View the image source and license