ARCHAEOLOGY EVIDENCE FILE325
Manuscript

4QRuthᵃ (4Q104): Ruth in the Second Temple Period

Hasmonean Cave 4 fragments preserve Ruth 1:1-12 in Hebrew, attesting the famine, migration, bereavement, return, and first part of Naomi's farewell while revealing little about the copy's ancient use.

Artifact date
Herodian period
Findspot
Qumran Cave 4
Current location
Israel Antiquities Authority collections
START WITH THE FIND

What archaeologists can actually examine

4QRuthᵃ is a Hebrew parchment manuscript preserving portions of Ruth 1:1-12. Its visible and reconstructed lines cover the famine in the days of the judges, Elimelech's family leaving Bethlehem for Moab, the deaths of Elimelech, Mahlon, and Chilion, Naomi hearing that the Lord had visited Judah with food, and her departure with Ruth and Orpah. The surviving text reaches Naomi's appeal that her daughters-in-law return and seek rest in new households. This modest witness establishes that Ruth's opening narrative circulated in substantially recognizable Hebrew during the late Second Temple period.

01

Ruth 1:1-12 survives

The manuscript covers famine, migration, bereavement, Naomi's return, and the beginning of her farewell to Ruth and Orpah.

02

Ruth's pledge is not extant here

Verses 16-17 lie beyond the secure surviving range and should not be presented as physically preserved by 4Q104.

03

One of several ancient Ruth copies

4Q104 must remain distinct from 4Q105 and 2Q16, which preserve overlapping or later portions.

04

Use and canonical setting are unknown

Presence in Cave 4 does not disclose whether the scroll was liturgical, private, or organized within a fixed collection.

THE FULL DOSSIER · FOUR-PART REVIEW

Follow the evidence from discovery to debate

Move through the find in a deliberate order: establish its provenance, examine the surviving object, place it in time, and then weigh the scholarly interpretation.

DISCOVERY & PROVENANCE

How the find came to light

The fragments were recovered from Qumran Cave 4 and assigned the official number 4Q104 after identification among thousands of detached pieces. They were distinguished from 4Q105, another Cave 4 Ruth manuscript, and from 2Q16, which preserves later chapters. Modern digital work now offers a letter-by-letter transcription through the Göttingen Qumran-Digital project, while the Israel Antiquities Authority hosts exact-fragment images. These resources expose editorial method: brackets mark reconstructed letters, and versioned transcriptions can change when readings or joins are reassessed. No discovery label or ancient title survives on the parchment itself.

EXAMINE THE OBJECT

What you are looking at

4Q104 consists of small leather fragments written in Hebrew square script. The surviving portions belong to the opening narrative rather than the genealogy or threshing-floor scenes. Names and place terms—Bethlehem, Judah, Moab, Elimelech, Naomi, Mahlon, Chilion, Ruth, and Orpah—anchor the identification, while ordinary verbs of going, returning, dying, hearing, giving, kissing, and weeping preserve the story's movement. Torn edges remove much of every line, so modern readers see more bracketed restoration than intact continuous prose. The manuscript is a copy of Ruth, not an inscription produced by any person named in the story.

DATING & CONTEXT

Where it belongs in history

Major catalogues generally assign 4Q104 to a Hasmonean hand, though the existing live record labels it more broadly Herodian. The palaeographic classification should be reviewed against the official edition rather than silently asserted as an exact date. In either case, the copy belongs to the late Second Temple era and long predates complete medieval Hebrew manuscripts. Multiple Ruth copies at Qumran show that the short book circulated there or reached the caves, but manuscript presence does not reveal whether it was read liturgically at Shavuot, treated within a fixed Writings collection, or used for private study.

SCHOLARLY ASSESSMENT

Consensus, questions, and debate

The manuscript's identity and Ruth 1 contents are secure. Textual work compares its consonants with the Masoretic text and ancient versions, but the small amount preserved limits conclusions about the whole book. Qumran-Digital provides a transparent, versioned scholarly transcription under an explicit license, allowing each surviving form and restoration to be audited. Dating terminology varies in secondary lists, which is a reminder that palaeographic labels overlap and can be transmitted inconsistently. The scroll contributes to textual history more clearly than to debates about Ruth's composition date, canonical placement, or festival use.

READ THE TEXT

The biblical record beside the artifact

The physical text directly connects to Ruth 1:1-12. It preserves the setting 'in the days when the judges judged,' famine in the land, migration from Bethlehem to Moab, family bereavement, and Naomi's decision to return after hearing that Judah again had bread. The fragment reaches her blessing and initial instruction to Ruth and Orpah but does not preserve Ruth's full pledge in verses 16-17. Accordingly, Ruth 1:6-12 is a more exact primary connection than claiming the object physically contains the entire loyalty speech. Other Qumran Ruth manuscripts supply different portions and must not be merged into 4Q104.

Ruth 1:6–12

6¶ Then she arose with her daughters in law, that she might return from the country of Moab: for she had heard in the country of Moab how that the LORD had visited his people in giving them bread.

7Wherefore she went forth out of the place where she was, and her two daughters in law with her; and they went on the way to return unto the land of Judah.

8And Naomi said unto her two daughters in law, Go, return each to her mother’s house: the LORD deal kindly with you, as ye have dealt with the dead, and with me.

9The LORD grant you that ye may find rest, each [of you] in the house of her husband. Then she kissed them; and they lifted up their voice, and wept.

10And they said unto her, Surely we will return with thee unto thy people.

11And Naomi said, Turn again, my daughters: why will ye go with me? [are] there yet [any more] sons in my womb, that they may be your husbands?

12Turn again, my daughters, go [your way;] for I am too old to have an husband. If I should say, I have hope, [if] I should have an husband also to night, and should also bear sons;

WHY THIS FIND MATTERS

A responsible historical conclusion

4Q104 gives Ruth an ancient physical footprint. The familiar story of displacement, widowhood, return, and covenant kindness was being copied in Hebrew centuries before the medieval codices. Its value is particularly human in scale: names, journeys, bread, death, blessing, and tears survive on scraps from a desert cave. At the same time, the fragment resists overclaiming. It does not prove the historical biographies of Ruth or Naomi, yet it securely documents reception and preservation of their narrative. Together with other Ruth manuscripts, it shows that this small book was not absent from Qumran's scriptural world.

4Q104RuthDead Sea Scrollstextual transmission