
4QEzekielc (4Q75): The Date of Jerusalem’s Siege
A small Cave 4 Hebrew manuscript preserves Ezekiel 24:2–3, where the prophet is commanded to record the date on which Babylon’s king approached Jerusalem.
- Artifact date
- 100–50 BC
- Discovered
- 1952
- Findspot
- Qumran Cave 4, northwest shore of the Dead Sea, Judean Desert
- Current location
- Israel Antiquities Authority Dead Sea Scrolls collection and associated Cave 4 institutional holdings; consult the IAA manuscript catalog for the current plate record.
What archaeologists can actually examine
The ancient leather fragment preserves identifiable Hebrew wording from Ezekiel 24:2–3. The stable siglum 4Q75 identifies this physical manuscript, separate from other Qumran Ezekiel copies. Its evidentiary value is direct but narrow: it demonstrates that the dated Jerusalem siege oracle circulated in Hebrew in the second century BC. It does not independently date Nebuchadnezzar’s siege, prove the historical accuracy of every detail in Ezekiel, or reveal how much of the book the lost parent scroll originally contained.
A command to record the siege day
The fragment preserves the instruction to write down the day associated with Babylon’s approach to Jerusalem.
The cauldron parable begins
Surviving text reaches the opening of Ezekiel’s parable to the rebellious house.
A separate Ezekiel manuscript
4Q75 is physically distinct from the other Cave 4 Ezekiel witnesses already represented in the library.
Textual evidence, not siege verification
The object directly attests the copied passage but is not independent archaeological proof of the sixth-century event.
Follow the evidence from discovery to debate
Move through the find in a deliberate order: establish its provenance, examine the surviving object, place it in time, and then weigh the scholarly interpretation.
How the find came to light
Bedouin located Cave 4 near Khirbet Qumran in 1952, and archaeologists excavated the cave that September. The cave yielded thousands of fragments representing hundreds of manuscripts. Scholars sorted pieces by writing material, handwriting, textual overlap, and physical joins, assigning this Ezekiel manuscript the stable identifier 4Q75. Early Palestine Archaeological Museum photographs documented the fragments, while modern Israel Antiquities Authority multispectral imaging and Qumran-Digital transcription make the surviving lines available for close review. The secure provenance is the Cave 4 corpus. The copyist, owner, route to the cave, and exact circumstances in which the fragment was deposited remain unknown.
What you are looking at
4Q75 is a small leather manuscript fragment written in Hebrew. Its surviving words align with Ezekiel 24:2–3, including the command to write down the day and the statement that the king of Babylon had drawn near to Jerusalem, followed by the opening of the cauldron parable. Letter forms and surviving line sequence distinguish it as a separate physical manuscript from 4Q73 and 4Q74. Because so little remains, every visible letter, damaged edge, spacing decision, and editorial reconstruction matters. The fragment should be presented as a direct witness to a short passage, not as a miniature copy of the whole book.
Where it belongs in history
Palaeographic comparison dates the surviving copy to approximately 100–50 BC. That range belongs to the manuscript, not to Ezekiel’s original composition or to the sixth-century BC siege described in the text. Cave 4 belongs to the multilingual literary world of Second Temple Judaism, where multiple copies of prophetic books circulated beside law, prayer, interpretation, calendars, and other writings. The fragment’s presence in the cave fixes its deposit before the Roman-period end of the Qumran manuscript horizon, but it does not identify a sectarian copyist or demonstrate that every Cave 4 scroll had one institutional origin.
Consensus, questions, and debate
Editors identify the fragment through its surviving words and sequence and date it through the script. Its brevity limits textual classification: a few lines cannot define the character of the entire lost scroll or settle the relationship among all Ezekiel witnesses. Scholars distinguish manuscript evidence from event evidence. 4Q75 is important for the former, while Babylonian chronicles, destruction deposits, and historical reconstruction address the latter. This distinction allows the fragment’s genuine value to be stated without inflating it.
The biblical record beside the artifact
Ezekiel 24:2 commands the prophet to record a specific day because the king of Babylon had begun his move against Jerusalem, and verse 3 introduces the cauldron parable addressed to the rebellious house. 4Q75 directly witnesses this wording in an ancient Hebrew copy. It therefore illuminates transmission of a date-conscious prophetic oracle. The manuscript attests the text, while the Babylonian siege itself must be evaluated from the broader biblical, Babylonian, and archaeological evidence.
Ezekiel 24:2–3
2Son of man, write thee the name of the day, [even] of this same day: the king of Babylon set himself against Jerusalem this same day.
3And utter a parable unto the rebellious house, and say unto them, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Set on a pot, set [it] on, and also pour water into it:
A responsible historical conclusion
The command to write the day makes this tiny object unusually self-referential: an ancient copy preserves a passage about fixing history in writing. It connects prophetic proclamation, communal memory, and a dated national catastrophe in only a few surviving lines. Alongside the other Qumran Ezekiel manuscripts, 4Q75 also shows that the book circulated in more than one physical copy, enabling comparison rather than dependence on a single artifact.
Authoritative sources
Institutional catalogs, excavation reports, and academic publications let you examine the evidence beyond this summary.
IAA Leon Levy Catalog: 4Q Ezekiel (4Q75)
Israel Antiquities Authority, Leon Levy Dead Sea Scrolls Digital LibraryOfficial institutional catalog page identifying manuscript 4Q75 as a Cave 4 Ezekiel witness and situating it within the IAA archive.
Qumran-Digital Diplomatic Transcription: 4Q75
Qumran-Digital / Göttingen Academy research traditionAcademic diplomatic transcription exposing the surviving fragment and line structure of 4Q75 for comparison with Ezekiel 24:2–3.
Qumran Cave 4, X: The Prophets
Oxford Academic / Discoveries in the Judaean DesertScholarly publication record for the critical Cave 4 Prophets edition family containing 4Q75.
Cave 4Q Context Photograph and License
Wikimedia CommonsIndividual Wikimedia file page for Bahnfrend’s photograph of the Qumran Cave 4 entrance, verified as the uploader’s own work under CC BY-SA 4.0. This is an excavation-site context image and does not depict the manuscript.
Excavation-site context: the entrance of Qumran Cave 4, the findspot of this manuscript; the manuscript itself is not pictured. · Bahnfrend via Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA 4.0
View the image source and license